Makes sense

“I’ll take a overlayfs with a side of kernel namepspaces”

$500000000000000000000

I use the Arch wiki for non arch stuff

That and the man pages

The tweaks can make a huge difference on more obscure hardware

Mostly but some base distros change the kernel config and other make changes to the code for some reason.

You need kernel support

Distros probably won’t change that unless they are doing something goofy with the kernel (screams at Ubuntu)

That’s Fedora

Terminal the movie seems really obscure

Windows terminal is actually decent

Don’t be a creep

Pearson is the worst

Not surprising

What I find interesting is when typically non tech savvy people start using things like Brave.

Goes to show how shit the tech industry is

Where is the sauce?

Sauce?

I think that mentality is silly

However, once you get past a certain age change becomes hard

I wouldn’t go that far

The problem with assembly is that it is almost impossible to optimize it as a human. Way back in the day instruction sets were written for humans but these days it is highly unlikely that you will be able to write assembly that can outperform a compiler. The reason primary has to do with pipelining and caching since modern CPUs are extremely complex.

Fedora hasn’t really had this issue and it is on the edge.

It is probably more of an act of desperation to stay relevant

Contrary to popular belief, it is possible to write software in C that is very secure. It takes thought but C has the edge with its small footprint and system integration