• MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh yeah, and disallowing employees from discussing their income, I think was another one.

    Lots of anti-union behavior.

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Im very happy to see people aren’t downplaying what a shitty guy he is here.

      Like the way you treat your employees and the people you work with is shit that actually matters.

      I don’t give a shit if someone is clumsy for entertainment, I give a shit when their workspace is a good ol boys club, sweatshop, and then when they decide to threaten a defamation lawsuit against a former female employee they brought in under very suspect circumstances in the first place all because they couldn’t find evidence within their company they admit has an awful HR department.

      Just a fucking mess, and I hate that shitty people just succeed nowadays.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        “brought in under suspect circumstances”

        Genuinely curious at what you’re hinting at here. I thought I was fairly familiar with the story, but I thought that employee was mostly brought in because she was popular with viewers, is there something more sinister there too?

        • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Its been a while so my memory is hazy, but basically, she recently lost her support systems and was brought to a new country where she basically couldn’t afford to lose that job. This adds a lot of context to her statements after when combined with other details about the company. Hopefully someone else remembers better, because Im sure there was something more sketchy about it Im failing to remember.