xabd@sh.itjust.works to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoWhen both say “I love privacy”sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square156fedilinkarrow-up1526arrow-down184
arrow-up1442arrow-down1imageWhen both say “I love privacy”sh.itjust.worksxabd@sh.itjust.works to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square156fedilink
minus-squareExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·1 day agoI disagree, you don’t have to look closely at all to get the function of several, unless you consider 1-2 seconds looking closely of course…
minus-squaredontsayaword@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 day ago unless you consider 1-2 seconds looking closely of course… I do - It should be recognizable in a glance (milliseconds, not seconds). Maybe it sounds minor, but I work in design and let me tell you it makes a big difference.
I disagree, you don’t have to look closely at all to get the function of several, unless you consider 1-2 seconds looking closely of course…
I do - It should be recognizable in a glance (milliseconds, not seconds). Maybe it sounds minor, but I work in design and let me tell you it makes a big difference.