Literally everything with USB can read FAT32, there’s some old or incredibly simple stuff out there that doesn’t read exFAT.

Manufacturers ideally want to spend as little as possible handling support for users, so they go with the option that isn’t going to result in returns from people who think it doesn’t work with their old printer or whatever.

They took out the clause in their policy about not selling user data.

It’s pretty obvious what follows that

This has given me a horrendous idea involving a Windows batch file and a weird shebang

Evil

The system V init approach did the job fine for a couple of decades—even if the actual service definitions were a glorified shell switch statement as you insinuate.

Canonical did their upstart thing for a couple of years that wasn’t too bad to use, personally I’m glad they ended up switching to systemd though.

I’m starting to think mid-century cooking was a psy-op

Arch and TempleOS being in the same sentence is pretty apt

Both are weirdly religious

I think the only apt end is for him to be yote into the ever expanding nothingness of the universe

Let’s be real though, What’s someone doing with three oscilloscopes

I always thought someone should do a fight scene to Venetian Snares - A Lot of Drugs

I guess sometimes you need to be the change you want to see in the world

A modern text editor with language servers running absolutely will take up 1GB+, I know I can easily get neovim to go past that with typescript projects.

I feel like we all independently invented the absolute LAN party classic of halo system link:

Hang em high with rocket launchers & plasma grenades only.

Nearly as iconic as blood gulch IMO

Lossless means it sounds exactly like the CD copy, should it exist

You’re bang on with everything but this, if you’re getting FLACs from the source, you may be getting higher quality than CD which is 16-bit 44.1khz. I’ve got many 24-bit 96khz FLACs in my collection

Your last point about Bluetooth is such a great one though. Recompression of already compressed audio is a much worse end result than compressing uncompressed audio one time (and before anyone says it, basically no one is listening to lossless Bluetooth audio)