• 0 Posts
  • 75 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 21st, 2023

help-circle
  • We know because the guy who wrote it told us.

    The guy who first wrote “eiland” spelled it as such. Then some idiot put an ‘s’ on it as a stylistic choice to latinize a word that has no Latin root. Now if you spell it any way other than “island” you are wrong because that is the way to word is used and understood.

    Or, to put it another way, if you want to insist language is set in stone let me translate for you:

    Se mann þe ǣrest wrāt “eiland,” swā hine stæfode. Þā sum dysig mann an ‘s’ onlēde swā stīlcræft, tō Lǣden sprǣce þæt word þe næfþ nān Lǣden rōt. Nū gif þū hine stæfian on ǣnige wīsan būtan “island,” þū bist wōh, forþām þæt is sēo wīs þe þæt word is gebrocen and understonden.













  • The “which one” was in reference to the original comment. Which was about Epic.

    So we were talking about epic. Glad we cleared that up.

    Dictionaries generally (because each one is going to have a slightly different definition) define it as having complete control over a market.

    So it’s not a Monopoly then.

    Whereas a lot of the monopoly laws and departments define it as having over a certain percentage of the market share, even if it isn’t 100%

    And seeing as Valve appears to not be running afoul of these laws, not a Monopoly then.







  • Imagine being so full of yourself that you think saying nothing has any value.

    Fun fact: the term “Stockholm syndrome” originates from a hostage situation in which the authorities did not seem to care about the safety of the hostages at all, they regularly put the hostages in danger and the hostage takers were frequently trying to protect the hostages from the actions of the authorities.
    In light of that, the hostages having more empathy towards their captors makes perfect sense. However ignorant people who did not understand the details of the event coined the term “Stockholm syndrome” instead of actually listening to the hostages or trying to understand a different point of view.

    Your use of the term feels very appropriate.