• 0 Posts
  • 188 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2020

help-circle


  • Ephera@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldSmart bed? Really?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 days ago

    What I find most frustrating about this kind of incident is this:

    xkcd comic about the entire software engineering field not being trustworthy

    There is fucking nothing that would prevent humanity from actually building a ‘smart’ bed. Something that gives you data and allows you to control heating etc. based on this data, without these features being a liability.
    This would’ve been possible decades ago and technological advancements have made building reliable software easier ever since.

    But unregulated capitalism means that instead of using this to actually build reliable software, it’s rather used to cut costs. You still get the same unreliable mess.
    And the worst part is that this isn’t even in the interest of capitalism either. Sending shivers down the spine of any experts that hear about your smart device means that excitement among potential customers won’t be excessive either.











  • Ephera@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldPure magic!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    My parents recently got a new wired telephone at their home. It announces on the display that a call is coming in, but only starts ringing a second later.

    I would love to know why that was deemed a good design decision.




  • Then you get other side-effects, like them ignoring or infinitely delaying tickets that are harder to solve. It’s a somewhat universal rule of capitalism: As soon as there is a metric for success, the goal is to game that metric as much as possible, because that maximizes the supposed success while minimizing costs.

    You can try to define multiple metrics to make this more difficult. And you can set a higher target value than necessary, so that even with the gaming, it’s still within an acceptable margin.
    But IMHO it’s still better to just treat it as a cost of doing business than to invest lots of money to try to make it measurable in an attempt to reduce the money spent.



  • Ephera@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldSomething about incentives
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Yeah, I think, it’s important to name and shame, because they actively avoid providing the service that they advertise, but I do also expect this to be a common pattern in the industry. If you actually solved problems and did so permanently, you’d be out of business very quickly. External support providers have an inherent interest for things to work as badly as possible, so long as it does not get their contracts cancelled.


  • Ephera@lemmy.mltomemes@lemmy.worldSomething about incentives
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh man, my workplace switched to an external IT support company, InfoSys, which pulls basically the same scam.

    When you open a ticket, they immediately write something underneath – typically a question that’s already answered in the ticket – because it shows up in their statistics as low response times.

    Then they’ll do shit like split up your ticket into three new tickets for no good reason.

    And if you happen to be on holiday for a few days and therefore don’t respond, they’ll close your tickets due to inactivity.

    Then you have to open a new ticket and link to the old ticket, if you can still access it, and then re-answer the same braindead questions again.

    Basically, if it’s something you can solve yourself, you should, because it will take more time to communicate back and forth with InfoSys.