Blockchain is immutable but legal contracts usually are not. They have break clauses, implied rights etc.

I suspect everything can be implemented correctly, but my doubt isn’t technical, it’s legal.

Think of a smart contracts like a vending machine. You can’t just build one and start selling real things from it. Laws need to be followed.

Correct. Proof of stake is much more efficient than proof of work, but electricity is still needed to run 24/7 the million validators securing the network.

The off chain legalities are the tricky part of a real estate crypto deal.

Can changing house ownership really be as simple as making an alterations on a decentralized ledger?

So what’s a hard fork?

Most of the 2nd and 3rd generation blockchains are much less energy intensive (although still more than a home PC).

For example, Ethereum could be run on the energy equivalent of a single wind turbine.

Why not? Lemmy doesn’t seem bot proof. Quite the opposite really.

In separate buildings.

It increases if you find them near secure locations.

At the time I thought Musk had inside knowledge.

No, he’s just a massive dick.

My confusion is that a degree in humanities doesn’t guarantee that someone can create clear instructions or follow then. (Nor does a degree in mathematics but at least there is some logic involved)

Mathematicians can usually read.

humanities?

You spelt Math incorrectly.

humanities?

You spelt Math incorrectly.

OK. This is the first real use case I’ve seen for AI voice generation and image to video.

They could put a spring in it.

It’s also how Bond originally killed Dr No

Bond kills No by taking over the guano-loading machine at the docks and diverting the flow of guano to bury him alive.

Call it Guano and sell it as fertiliser.

You can do sneaky things with weights that are virtually undetectable.

Ahh. Not the Amazon version.

Or get a 5 string for those super low notes.