I know what kind of pfp they put on, I JUST CAN’T PROVE IT
I know what kind of pfp they put on, I JUST CAN’T PROVE IT
Which is clearly…
The pen
Same here, Fedora, in particular, once atomic, I’m never looking back on my machines.
Before that I once used Endeavour and can vouch for its reliability
Wow, that’s a very thorough review, nice!
I do hope that these companies start to dig one inch deeper at least before providing grants and stuff, it really is a slap in the face of proper distributions (though I feel like the author’s recommendation of Manjaro is misguided 👀), of course at the end of the day they can give money to whoever the hell they want, but if they want to make good publicity, they’d better make sure they get it right


Would love to point you in the right direction, but I’ve only briefly skimmed some articles that talk about how the thing I was referring to, i.e. making container images with Nix as the base, can be made.
As for service definitions in Compose, I’m not aware of a way to map that into a Nix native approach. There might be though, I don’t know


Container images and NixOS is actually a match made in heaven, so yes it’s NixOS all the way, except I spend 10 times reading scattered documentation and tutorials rather than getting a working configuration… Fedora ain’t so bad


Knome or go home


That’s actually cute, sometimes I wish I were innocent to the abomination of squeal


Guh-asp!


Knice to meat you



This incident will be reported
An admirable example of working harder, not smarter
I love it when the hostility adapts to my system


Of course, but an Arch user would definitely fit the more effortful path kind, though taking a great picture might actually be harder between the fiddling with parameters and the set design


Ah I see, really cool nonetheless, it’s a great composition!


Is this a render? If so, it looks damn good! (And hopefully rendered on Arch)
OSTree mfs: let us introduce ourselves
That’s when you know the shit is good, and I’m not kidding
CON-plain