The unix philosophy is kinda vague and always felt more like do as I say not as I do. But I think the more generous response is that the philosophy is focused on user space applications.

What makes you say it doesn’t work? They have a whole POSIX subsystem.

Last usable version

I think the answer is yes. Last time I did a survey of options a lot of them seemed highly unreliable. Framework was one exception but… unfortunately I think you kinda just have to like the framework idea. The massive premium you pay there just doesn’t make financial sense unless you actively (ab)use your hardware such that it might really fail within the useful lifetime of the processor. (Ie I can buy two laptops for the price of one framework, so…why not just do that if the first fails?)

That would be unix then :)

There isn’t some magic to this. Someone puts out a game thats as popular as say bg3 but doesn’t run on steam deck and all these memes will go away overnight. Just hope that doesn’t happen.

deleted by creator

I do wonder how many people only hate windows because their IT installed crapware that takes half the CPU scanning every file move.

I watched a fascinating rust video where this guy was talking about all of the things different OSs do differently just in the rust up install process. And how one of them (I assume windows but don’t recall) was way worse but it was fixed by changing how they did IO. I don’t work at that lower level so it’s not a thing for me, but it was interesting. (I tried to find but failed)

Chrome. Or Firefox. They don’t use less ram on Linux. I can easily get Firefox to 10G.

Yeah but try 3 mfer

I hope it doesn’t fail open :)

Also I can melt steel with my mind.

This seems more like correlation than anything else. Not that it’s necessarily wrong but it seems very abstract. For example it says an hour of tv time is bad, but that’s just consumption and it also doesn’t mention, for example, engagement. It says some types of content can reduce focus, sure, but people usually don’t offer that type of nuance when they say “screen time bad!”. It also says clearly that there are other types of content that are valuable. It doesn’t have an explanation why reading a book is more or less engaging and helpful than say, watching the same story on tv?

Point is im 100% confident there are specific things that are bad, but the blanket ban seems silly and ineffective, potentially harming the child.

I didn’t claim to understand it but I do claim to remember my sister trying to explain it to me, and that computer only existed during a certain time period.

Forget NASA, 100 ping is pretty good for internet gaming…in the dsl days. Sure your warthog or ghost might occasionally plow into the wall of a canyon but the brain adapts.

Nah a lot of people now think screen time is bad without evidence. Never would be allowed to get on a computer at 3-4.

Actually Demon is the next evolutionary form after social media CEO. Per Michael it’s…

1. larva,
2. slug monster,
3. spooky little girl,
4. teenage boy,
5. Giant ball of tongues,
6. social media CEO,
7. demon.

No lizards at all.

Do you want to get to a point, here? Cause so far you’ve made a weird distinction but that distinction seems to have no purpose.

Are these “providers” in the room with us right now?

Are these “workers” with us in the room right now?

Well this is a take ive never heard before. So when one orders doordash, no workers are involved?