Just check it with lsusb on Linux and you’ll see the device and vendor id stays the same, independent of the port - else no udev rules would work

Don’t know though what ever the fuck windows is doing…

That’s because some program still accesses it

Could be just your file browser (“explorer”) that has a window open with the content of that device, or maybe some program has a hiccup and didn’t free it’s file pointer

Usually you have a vendor and a device id to identify the connected device on the bus

You’re right though, that in every different port it will get its own memory allocated an so on (at least I also believe that), but that’s no reason to not identify the already known device

Well, depends on what you need to restart.

If it’s just a service or two, then it’s pretty quick.

Obviously you need to know, what you’re doing.
And I think that’s pretty hard with windows, because it never tells you, what it’s actually doing during an update.

With Linux it’s much more transparent and often the restart of a service is just part of my update routine.
No need to close and save all my open stuff, and reboot. Just restart the few services that got an update and that’s pretty much it.

So, really depends on the update, the transparency of it and also the personal insight/skill

Not of you need to wait for ever for an update to finish during shutdown, when you just want to pack up your laptop and finally leave the work site - and afterwards it somehow needs the same time to boot up again, because it’s preparing out finishing something, without ever telling you, what the hell it’s actually doing all the time

And usual reboot only takes like 20s, you’re right there, but not with a windows update blocking a normal shutdown or startup

So, like Trump, Musk, Putin, Kim Jong-Un,…?
Pretty much every (wanna-be) dictator was/is a narcissistic petulant child.

I’m not sure how the image looks on your side, but on my end there is nothing highlighted, but only striked through and I can’t read these text parts anymore

And you still went for your edited version on not just gave up and post the original?
Not sure what to say. Maybe respect for your commitment?

deleted by creator

As far as I know they have done different approaches and not just the lava lamps

From a quick search:
Double pendulum system in London
radioactive decay of a uranium pellet in Singapore

True that, but then the baby would also need to be sectioned, no?

But, I want to give up now, I get that I’ve viewed it wrong

That one didn’t seem double on first sight

I’m actually not sure if I’m falling for a joke here, but that’s how I remember that a spine looks like

Even if it’s a section view, there shouldn’t be 2 of them… Or maybe I just don’t see it correctly…

Edit: ah, now I somehow see it. But still, it doesn’t really look correct with the spinal cord like splitting it. Although given that this would be a bit hard to visualise in a 2D slice…
I’m still not convinced that this is actually correct ;⁠-⁠)

Why is nobody talking about the fucking double spine?

Or am I somehow stupid and interpreted that fucked up graphic wrong - if that even is possibly, because so much is wrong with that?

I was more thinking about not driving the car myself, but being driven as a passenger

Although it’s obviously a safety issue, when people turn away their focus to checkout a crash - no discussion about that - I was more thinking about the ethical issue of gaffing at injured people

I’m not sure a pseudo QR code on the truck gives off the right message

I actually would really like to know, what it says and would make myself punishable by that
But I think, it looks so inviting to scan it…