I love how you state that as a fact as if words like give, gift, gill, gibbon, giddy, etc don’t exist.

please tell me you call it JIT-HUB.

if it’s not in the text I’m not taking chances

i thought it said “dying off and doing ok” and was confused for a while

way too vague. expect the Star Trek transport to put you in the vacuum of space to die a horrible death

it’s what happens when you elect economic geniuses

juvenoia

https://youtu.be/LD0x7ho_IYc

it’s not though. the point is games don’t need to be that costly or pricey to be good.

no, it’s not. unless there are people protesting outside so-called AAA company offices to only make games with more crunch, bigger empty maps with pointless busywork, more detailed “realistic” looting animations that take so long it becomes a chore playing the game, it’s their choice and waste to do so. no one asks games to cost millions to make, and no one demands them to make billions to count as successful. they pretend this is a demand. it’s not.

it’s not. one being infinitely more wasteful for a lesser product that costs more doesn’t make it a bad comparison.

people call everything that now. this is not dreamworks face.

well that’s the point isn’t it? it’s not a Bethesda game, you don’t gotta catch’em all and there are consequences to your actions

“when things are so bad you start obeying traffic laws as if you give a shit whether or not you’d kill some kid today.”

exactly. I’ve always disliked this. but also the older i get the more i find this antisocial attitude immature as fuck. hating people isn’t a virtue, and most likely, being a person who brags about hating everyone unprompted, you’re not the best person in most rooms to justify this in the first place.

this is such propaganda. barely anything here is accurate.

politicians demand accountability? bullshit.

lead investigation? if there’s one at all, it’s the cops themselves.

lack of training? no, the cops investigate themselves and find no wrongdoing, or it’s standard protocol

this comic strip should just be three panels:

police shoots someone, politicians raise funds for police, police shoots someone with newer toys

I guess it’s easy to miss that m% just means ×m÷100

6% of 50 means 50 × 6 ÷ 100, and because multiplication and division have the same order of operations you can switch them around. so it is also equal to 6 × 50 ÷ 100, in which you can simplify 50 ÷ 100 into 1 ÷ 2, but you could always do that: 50 × 6 ÷ 100 = 1 × 6 ÷ 2.

this “shortcut” however is of extremely limited use. basically for taking a percentage of anything other than things that can very easily divide or multiply 100 like 50 in this example or maybe 10 or 500 it’s nearly useless.

66.7-33.3, naturally, as everyone would expect double or nothing to have double chance of nothing over double rather than no chance of double over nothing.

dunno but if you need any you can ask any dude for that, most of them would be very open to it.

bi erasure, obviously

i know the author is only familiar with their own experiences and i don’t expect them to know the other side but this is definitely not exclusive to women’s clothes. every brand just uses their own sizes for everything from hats to pants to shoes.