Stamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agoI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up1666arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1653arrow-down1imageI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square65fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months agoPffft, Dnd had the ‘first diagonal 5, second diagonal 10’ rule. It worked well enough, aye?
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoIt doesn’t anymore =( 5e uses diagonal = 5’
minus-squareedgemaster72@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoAlternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoOh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares
minus-squareVespair@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoWell anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months ago4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances. Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.
Pffft, Dnd had the ‘first diagonal 5, second diagonal 10’ rule. It worked well enough, aye?
It doesn’t anymore =(
5e uses diagonal = 5’
Alternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
Oh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares
Well anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.
4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances.
Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.