afk_strats@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoInspired by a Lemmy postlemmy.worldimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1828arrow-down16
arrow-up1822arrow-down1imageInspired by a Lemmy postlemmy.worldafk_strats@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoThose look like 3.5" drives.
minus-squareSapphironZA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 month agoFront loading bays though. Most 3.5 inch drives go in top loading bays. Do they looking like modern 3.5inch drives, or older ones?
minus-squareDr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThere are a number of chassis that have front loading 3.5" bays. I have one at home. Looking at the pic, each chassis looks to be 3U. I’d bet money those are 3.5".
minus-squareSapphironZA@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoWhat I meant, is that they are not commonly used anymore, because of how expensive rackspace and power has become in commercial settings.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI’d have to see the connection ports… IDE, SATA, and SCSI drives all look the same unless it’s one of the 5 inch drives that afaik only ever were SCSI.
Those look like 3.5" drives.
Front loading bays though. Most 3.5 inch drives go in top loading bays. Do they looking like modern 3.5inch drives, or older ones?
There are a number of chassis that have front loading 3.5" bays. I have one at home.
Looking at the pic, each chassis looks to be 3U. I’d bet money those are 3.5".
What I meant, is that they are not commonly used anymore, because of how expensive rackspace and power has become in commercial settings.
I’d have to see the connection ports… IDE, SATA, and SCSI drives all look the same unless it’s one of the 5 inch drives that afaik only ever were SCSI.