• iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you can choose. I wasn’t able to get chromium installed without hunting for a .deb and I needed USB access which snap didn’t give me

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The biggest issue to me with snap (unless something has changed since the last time I looked it up) is that it’s all a walled garden by canonical and it’s not open source (in the sense of package submission, review, rating, source availability, etc).

      With flatpak/flathub you can see the source and discussion behind each package

      https://github.com/orgs/flathub/repositories

      But that transparency doesn’t exist on snap so you are just hoping canonical did their homework on vetting apps

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 days ago

      I like the idea of it, but I had to install flatseal to get a bunch of really important things like password managers to work.

      I would like to see the experience improve, especially things where casual users won’t know how to do it themselves.

      Once everything is set up it’s very nice though.

  • dr_robotBones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Snaps filled up my root directory with all their ridiculous and mandatory backups. I had to get rid of them. Flatpaks are alright, but nothing beats native packages.