silence7@slrpnk.net to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoHow Big Oil says carbon capture works" vs "how carbon capture actually worksslrpnk.netimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1474arrow-down111
arrow-up1463arrow-down1imageHow Big Oil says carbon capture works" vs "how carbon capture actually worksslrpnk.netsilence7@slrpnk.net to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-square18107@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up46arrow-down1·3 days agoWe absolutely do need carbon capture research and development, along with gradually scaling up carbon capture projects. Unfortunately, carbon capture is useless if we’re still burning fossil fuels for power, heat, and transport. Carbon capture is actively harmful when used as an excuse to build new fossil fuel power plants.
minus-squarelepinkainen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 days agoLook into the finances of carbon capture companies They spend 90% of their budget on marketing across the board because they’re just fossil fuel companies in disguise
minus-squareWanderingThoughts@europe.publinkfedilinkarrow-up31arrow-down1·3 days agoCarbon capture is the best way to convert vague promises to subsidies.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoIf you can scale it up on renewables only to somewhere around a few million tons a year, then maybe.
minus-squareSaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoCarbon capture is easy. Plant more trees.
minus-squarevillage604@adultswim.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoAnd build more housing with them.
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoWoah there, wood? The stuff that blows over and not GLORIOUS STONE AND CONCRETE? I think you may be on yo something. Just don’t tell Europe a lot of them get mad at the sight of wood houses
minus-squareTankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·3 days ago Unfortunately, carbon capture is useless if we’re still burning fossil fuels for power, heat, and transport. Carbon capture is actively harmful when used as an excuse to build new fossil fuel power plants. Yeah, it’s a blank check to just produce more CO2.
We absolutely do need carbon capture research and development, along with gradually scaling up carbon capture projects.
Unfortunately, carbon capture is useless if we’re still burning fossil fuels for power, heat, and transport.
Carbon capture is actively harmful when used as an excuse to build new fossil fuel power plants.
Look into the finances of carbon capture companies
They spend 90% of their budget on marketing across the board because they’re just fossil fuel companies in disguise
Carbon capture is the best way to convert vague promises to subsidies.
If you can scale it up on renewables only to somewhere around a few million tons a year, then maybe.
Carbon capture is easy. Plant more trees.
And build more housing with them.
Woah there, wood? The stuff that blows over and not GLORIOUS STONE AND CONCRETE? I think you may be on yo something. Just don’t tell Europe a lot of them get mad at the sight of wood houses
Yeah, it’s a blank check to just produce more CO2.