• Vitaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    I don’t think they actually store any passwords, usually hashes are stored for better security. Of course not everyone does this so yeah thanks to Skeleton.

  • wer2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Jokes on me, the bank site doesn’t allow for special characters and has a hard limit of 10 characters.

    • python@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Hm, now you’re making me wonder how feasible it would be to use Emojis in my passwords…

      • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Should work alright if the server handles Unicode correctly, and isn’t one of those ass sites that put restrictions on the password’s length and composition. Hashing functions don’t even care if you’re feeding them raw binary.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Guys calm the fuck down. The point of this joke is not that you’ll be bulletproof a few in sort of a few commas and passwords every now and then. The point is that a lot of these guys use terrible scripts that do not parse data correctly and they dump all of this shit into large CSV files. One or two people put an errand, in there that it doesn’t expect and it fucks the whole thing sideways for the entire set everything after the asshole with the comma password gets fucked. People that know what they’re doing will be just fine with it, but scammers generally don’t know what the fuck they’re doing and they pass this data along over and over and over again it change his hands frequently. So there’s more chances for it to get fucked along the way.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t text with commas in it get put in double quotes in acsv file to avoid this exact thing?

    Like if I had cells (1A: this contains no comma), (2B: this, contains a comma), and (3C: end of line), the csv file would store (this contains no comma,“this, contains a comma”,end of line)

    • Wolf314159@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      A CSV is just a long string of text with a few control characters tossed in for end lines. There are practically no rules enforced by the file type itself. You can dump that unsanitized and poorly awk’d data into whatever awful mess you want. Nobody’s stopping you. Sure, excel will force it’s CSV formatting rules on you when you export like a child’s training wheels. But that’s not relevant here.

    • patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yes and no. Like yes, that can be true. But a lot of tools don’t handle commas correctly no matter how you escape them.

    • BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      21 hours ago

      CSV existed for over 30 years before RFC 4180. Excel, and countless other tools, have their own incompatible variants. Excel in particular is infamous for mangling separators when exporting to CSV.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Fuck Excel’s CSV handing. It differs by locale, silently. Imagine the thousands of people every year who patiently wait to import a multi-megabyte CSV from some instrument only to see garbage because their language uses the decimal comma and semicolon separator.

    • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You would be surprised how many people are simply splitting the string on commas instead of using an actual ascii parser. Especially for one off scripts, like churning through a csv full of passwords.

    • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      yeah unless you’re dealing with some steaming pile of vibe-coded shit this is a dumb as fuck idea.

      (have seen people who don’t know how to appropriately use an LLM just let it wholly reimplement standards, read it over, and then say “oh wow that works great!” smh…)

        • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          of course there’s always been terrible code. people used to and still do reinvent the wheel all the time, even without the help of a robot.

          trust me i’m one of the last people to shit on LLMs unnecessarily. the tools coming out nowadays are the bees knees. i think vibe coding is fucking awesome and most people’s premonitions against it are things that, similar to the premise, have just always been true - most of the “evil” of vibe coding can be dealt with easily by being a not shit engineer in the first place.

          plus, not every problem needs to be a software development problem through and through. sometimes you just need a webui or an api to browse a dataset, for example - it’s not opsec critical and you need it now. that’s okay. the moral police won’t come to your house and arrest you for vibe coding.